her2 positive cell line skbr3 (ATCC)
Structured Review

Her2 Positive Cell Line Skbr3, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 6488 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/her2+positive+cell+line+skbr3/pmc13126822-52-0-5?v=ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 6488 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "GCNT3 and ST3GAL1 expression correlates with HER2 status and MUC1/β-catenin/Cyclin D1 axis in breast cancer"
Article Title: GCNT3 and ST3GAL1 expression correlates with HER2 status and MUC1/β-catenin/Cyclin D1 axis in breast cancer
Journal: BMC Cancer
doi: 10.1186/s12885-026-15821-w
Figure Legend Snippet: In silico analysis showing differential expression of glycogenes in the progression of BC: A Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) showing the heatmap for different glycogenes in the HER2 high vs low phenotype. B Pie chart made using PANTHER software representing: cellular pathways of genes overexpressed in glycosylation geneset, and biological pathways of genes overexpressed in glycosylation geneset, C Cellular pathways of genes overexpressed in KRAS geneset and biological pathways of genes overexpressed in KRAS geneset. Major pathways highlighted in these pie charts have been indicated
Techniques Used: In Silico, Quantitative Proteomics, Software, Glycoproteomics
Figure Legend Snippet: In vitro analysis of ST3GAL1’s association with HER2: A Bar plot showing qRT-PCR analysis of ST3GAL1 in HER2 -ve and HER2 +ve BC cells. T-test based p-value obtained were as follows: SKBR3 vs MCF7 (p=0.0045, n=3), SKBR3 vs MDAMB231 (p=0.0034, n=3) and SKBR3 vs MDAMB435 (p=0.05, n=3). B Representative images of immunohistochemical analysis for ST3GAL1 in Grade 2 and 3 of Stage I, II and III BC tissues ( C ) ST3GAL1 expression in HER2 positive BC tissue. D Mean intensity value calculated as average pixel intensity using ImageJ, for ST3GAL1. Two-way ANOVA p-value exhibited p<0.05 (n=3) for Grade 2, Stage I vs Stage II vs Stage III. Similarly, p <0.05 (n=3) was obtained for Grade 3, Stage I vs Stage II vs Stage III. Moreover, t-test based p<0.05 (n=3) was obtained in the HER2 positive and HER2 negative BC tissues
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Quantitative RT-PCR, Immunohistochemical staining, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: In silico and in vitro analyses showing inverse association of GCNT3 with HER2: A Survival plot representing the gene expression of GCNT3 in BC cohorts. B Differential expression analysis of GCNT3 using the RNAseq data for the tumor vs control BC. C Differential expression analysis for the control vs tumor samples from the TCGA BC dataset for GCNT3 using GEPIA. D Bar plot showing qRT-PCR analysis for GCNT3 using the HER2 -ve and HER2 +ve BC cells with T-test based p-value obtained as follows: SKBR3 vs MCF7 (p=0.045, n=3), SKBR3 vs MDAMB231 (p=0.012, n=3) and SKBR3 vs MDAMB435 (p=0.00069, n=3). E Representative images of immunohistochemical analysis for GCNT3 in Grade 2 and 3 of Stage I, II and III BC tissues. F , G Mean intensity values calculated as average pixel intensity using ImageJ, for GCNT3. Two-way ANOVA p-value exhibited p<0.05 for Grade 2, Stage I vs Stage II vs Stage III. Similarly, p<0.05 (n=3) was obtained for Grade 3, Stage I vs Stage II vs Stage III. Additionally, t-test based p<0.05 (n=3) was obtained in the HER2 negative vs positive BC tissues
Techniques Used: In Silico, In Vitro, Gene Expression, Quantitative Proteomics, RNA sequencing, Control, Quantitative RT-PCR, Immunohistochemical staining
Figure Legend Snippet: In silico analysis of ST3GAL1’s association with HER2: A Survival plots representing gene expression of HER2 and ST3GAL1 for these genes in BC cohorts. B Oncomine extracted data represented by box plots on ST3GAL1 with increasing IHC score ( C ) Violin plots representing differential expression analysis of HER2 and ST3GAL for the tumor vs control using the RNAseq data for the BC samples. D Correlation plot between ST3GAL1 and HER2 on R2 dataset. E Differential expression analysis for the control vs tumor samples from the TCGA BC dataset for HER2 and ST3GAL1 using GEPIA. F Correlation plot between HER2 and ST3GAL1 on the cbioportal database
Techniques Used: In Silico, Gene Expression, Quantitative Proteomics, Control, RNA sequencing
Figure Legend Snippet: Functional analysis using GCNT3 inhibitor (talniflumate) in HER2 -ve and HER2 +ve BC cells: Representative images and quantification using talniflumate for ( A ) wound healing on MCF7 cells, t-test based p-value for control vs treatment at 24h and 48h were p=0.38 (n=3) and p=0.17 respectively, B colony formation on MCF7 cells, C wound healing on MDAMB231 cells, t-test based p-value for control vs treatment at 24h and 48h were p=0.023 (n=3) and p=0.084 (n=3) respectively, D colony formation on MDAMB231 cells, E wound healing on MDAMB435 cells, t-test based p-value for control vs treatment at 24h and 48h were p=0.09 (n=3) and p=0.40 (n=3) respectively, F colony formation on MDAMB435 cells, G . wound healing for SKBR3 cells, t-test based p-value for control vs treatment at 12h and 24h were p=0.49 (n=3) and p=0.32 (n=3) respectively and H colony formation for SKBR3 cells. NOTE: T-test based p-value calculation for colony formation assay were found to be p<0.05 (n=3) for all the cell lines
Techniques Used: Functional Assay, Control, Colony Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Clinical significance of MUC1, β-catenin, Cyclin D1 in BC specimens: Representative images of immunohistochemical analysis in different stages and grades of BC for ( A ) β-catenin ( B ) MUC1 and C Cyclin D1. Mean intensity calculated of ( D ) β-catenin analyzed using two-way ANOVA p-value exhibited p<0.05 (n=3) for Grade 2, Stage I vs Stage II vs Stage III and Grade 3, Stage I vs Stage II vs Stage III, E MUC1 analyzed usingtwo-way ANOVA p-value exhibited p<0.05 (n=3) for Grade 2, Stage I vs Stage II, III and p>0.05 (n=3) for Grade 3, Stage I vs Stage II vs Stage III and F Cyclin D1 analyzed using two-way ANOVA p-value exhibited p<0.05 (n=3) for Grade 2, Stage I vs Stage II vs Stage III; however p>0.05 (n=3) was found for Grade 3 tissues. All the BC tissues herein were HER2 -ve
Techniques Used: Immunohistochemical staining
Figure Legend Snippet: Multiple analyses of GCNT3 in driving the MUC1/β-catenin/Cyclin D1 axis in BC: Representative immunohistochemistry images and mean intensity plots of HER2 +ve and HER2 -ve BC samples for (A ) β-catenin ( B ) MUC1 and C Cyclin D1. D Correlation plots of MUC1 with GCNT3, β-catenin, Cyclin D1 and ST3GAL1. E Gene interacting plot for GCNT3 with top 20 interacting nodes using STRING. F Scheme of the mechanistic link between GCNT3 and the β-catenin/Cyclin D1 axis in breast cancer. NOTE: T-test based p-value was found to be significant only for the Cyclin D1 stained HER2 positive vs negative BC tissues (p<0.05, n=3) whereas they were insignificant for the β-catenin and MUC1
Techniques Used: Immunohistochemistry, Staining


